Saturday, August 15, 2009
Intel Xeon 5500 (Nehalem EP) NUMA Versus Interleaved Memory (aka SUMA): There Is No Difference! A Forced Confession.
I received an interesting email recently from a reader that takes offense at how I dare to discuss the differences between Intel Xeon 5500 (Nehalem) systems operating in NUMA versus SUMA/SUMO mode. One excerpt of the email read:
…and I think you are just creating confusion and chaos to gain popularity with your NUMA versus non-NUMA stuff. We tested everything we can think of and see no difference when booted with NUMA or non-NUMA…
I don’t doubt for one moment that the testing performed by this reader showed no performance differences between NUMA and SUMA because I have no idea whatsoever what his testing consisted of. And, besides, Xeon 5500 Nehalem EP is one extremely nice NUMA package. That is, when running non-NUMA aware software on this particular NUMA offering you can rest assured that you won’t likely fall over dead from NUMA pathologies. That’s good, but does that mean there really is no difference when booted in the NUMA versus SUMA? Hardly! more. . .
FINANCE: Firm Escorts Nanotech Energy Startups through 'Valley of Death
Microsoft submits source code for Linux kernel
ANSI Nanotechnology Standards Panel Meeting To Be Held September 9
"The growing number of nanotechnology-based industrial products and services has created a critical need for standards to support trade in this arena and to be used in protecting the environment and the health and safety of consumers and workers," said Clayton Teague, chairman of the ANSI-NSP and director of the National Nanotechnology Coordination Office (NNCO). "But in order to move these standards forward, we need active engagement by technical experts from academia and significant industry sectors that are working to advance this important and promising technology."
Formed in 2004, the ANSI-NSP serves as a cross-sector more . . .